Skip to content

Finite maps equal compact surfaces

May 18, 2011

In the earlier post What is a regular map? we stated a side result without proving it. Let’s do that now.

Prop. A topological map (\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{V}, \mathcal{S}) is finite if and only if the surface \mathcal{S} is compact.

Proof. Suppose that the surface \mathcal{S} is compact and the map is infinite; in other words \Omega is infinite. Since the valency of all the vertices is finite (AG3) we conclude that |\mathcal{V}| is infinite. This implies that there is an accumulation point on \mathcal{S} for the set \mathcal{V}. Let v_1, v_2, \dots be a converging sequence of vertices; (TM1) implies that for n large enough,  these vertices must all be joined to each other and, what is more, they must all have valency 2 (think of the edges between them forming a single line on which they all lie). Then, for n large enough every v_n lies on two darts \alpha_n, \beta_n and (provided we label darts appropriately) it is clear that face(\alpha_n) = face(\alpha_m) for n and m large enough. This is a contradiction of (TM4).

Now for the converse; we suppose that the map is finite. Let f be a face of the map; (TM4) implies that there are a finite number of darts \alpha for which f=face(\alpha). We list these darts:\alpha_1=(v_1, e_1), \dots, \alpha_n=(v_n, e_n). Now (TM3) implies that f is homeomorphic to an open disc; it is clearly sufficient to show that f\cup e_1 \cup \cdots \cup e_n is homeomorphic to a closed disc (since then the surface \mathcal{S} is homeomorphic to a finite union of compact surfaces and so is itself compact).

Now why is f\cup e_1 \cup \cdots \cup e_n is homeomorphic to a closed disc? First of all, there is the possibility that n=1 and the edge e_1 is a loop. In this case the result is clear. Suppose this is not the case – then all edges are segments or free-edges. With a little thought it should be clear that the edges e_i which are segments form a closed loop; the free-edges can be thought of as spikes coming off this closed loop, “poking into” the face f. This union of segments clearly forms the boundary of f\cup e_1 \cup \cdots \cup e_n; the required homeomorphism can then be obtained by “pinching” the face round each of the free-edges, and extending it smoothly to the union of segments. Hopefully the principle is clear.

QED

About these ads
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: